🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to ban social media access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to approve a proposal lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is given. While it warns of the "addictive" design of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a solid first step," stated the European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. One foundation founded by the relatives of a young person who was lost after being exposed to disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the state government level amid national gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from some figures to mimic Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, other nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international debate continues, the steps of the Australian government and others indicate that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.